For Registered
Investment Advisors.
Fiduciary-suitable alternative exposure. Structural discipline you can defend in compliance review.
Advisors including BettorToken in client portfolios do so as part of an alternative-income sleeve. What follows is how we structure that relationship, what we disclose, and how we support your fiduciary obligations.
A fiduciary-suitable alternative.
Registered Investment Advisors who include BettorToken in client portfolios typically do so as part of an alternative-income sleeve — alongside private credit, litigation finance, or event-linked notes. The structural discipline (outside counsel, verified accreditation, formal Legal Opinion for SPLT, documented risk disclosure) matters because you will be asked to defend the allocation in compliance review.
Fiduciary concerns we've already anticipated.
- Accreditation verification is third-party. We do not self-verify. All participants meet Rule 506(c) safe-harbor standards through an independent service, which protects both you and us.
- Risk disclosures are formal and documented. Full Risk Disclosure Document accompanies both the FYN and SPLT offering materials. Allocators and their advisors should review before committing.
- Concentration guidance is honest. We explicitly state these instruments should not be a meaningful percentage of any allocator's portfolio.
- Past performance caveats are paired with every performance statement. The +76.50% FY1 result is always presented with appropriate "past performance does not guarantee future results" language.
- Platform governance is documented. Corporate structure, IP ownership, entity separation, and governance protocols are all disclosed in the diligence package.
What to expect as a participating advisor.
Advisors get dedicated communication cadence appropriate to a fiduciary relationship: written quarterly updates, NAV reporting, annual reset documentation, and direct access to Company leadership for client diligence sessions.
We do not pay placement commissions or advisor fees outside formal placement-agent relationships. Our fee structure is transparent: what's disclosed in the offering documents is what we take, nothing more.
How the four investor types differ.
Same products. Different paths in. Your current page is highlighted.
| Investor Type | Typical Allocation | Timeline | Primary Path |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accredited Individual | $500K–$1M typical | 4–8 weeks | 15-min intro with leadership |
| Family Office | $500K–$5M typical | 4–6 weeks | Direct CEO engagement |
| RIA / Wealth Manager You are here | $500K+ per allocation | 6–8 weeks | Advisor desk · diligence package |
| Institutional Allocator | $5M+ for active dialogue | 8–12 weeks | Full diligence + DDQ + IC support |
Some investors hold both products. Some allocate to one. The 15-min intro is the right place to think through fit.
For committee-led allocators, the diligence package is usually the right first step. If you'd rather start with a 15-minute call with leadership, that path is open too.